tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4110180.post4735889064506300564..comments2023-06-20T05:31:24.545-07:00Comments on Tapestry Central: "Simple" JSF 2.0 Component vs. TapestryAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04486596490758986709noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4110180.post-4654204926330041092009-11-27T14:05:27.661-08:002009-11-27T14:05:27.661-08:00From the 'name' attribute description in t...From the 'name' attribute description in the JSF 2.0 Facelets Tag library docs:<br /><br />"The name of this composite component. Advisory only. The real name is taken from the filename. The value of this attribute will be set as the value for this property on the composite component bean descriptor."<br /><br />As you shown, Tapestry components are easy to read and understand while JSF 2.0 needs a little practice. But sometimes feels good to write simple components using only a xhtml file.Guilherme Hermetohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06956810391888734136noreply@blogger.com